Michael Joseph Little
  • My Blogs
    • Impact Stories >
      • Navy Retirement Ceremony
      • Great American Patriot Award
      • Kentucky Colonel
      • Honorary USN Chief Petty Officer
      • Honorary USCG Chief Petty Officer
      • Honorary CWO4
      • My Navy Career (18 Years and 2 Days)
      • HSC Elizabeth A Little
      • HSC Elizabeth A Little
      • Ancient & Honorable Order of Turtles
      • The Little Family Farm
      • USS Wasp (CV 7)
      • William's Baptism
      • Veterans Day 2017
      • Mary's Baptism
      • William & Mary School Stuff
    • Professional Work
    • Personal Blog
    • Fight Against the Navy
    • South Crouch Township
    • Private Journal
  • Sea Service Family, Consulting
  • Sea Service Family, Foundation
  • Contact Me
"No Veteran Left Behind"

Fight over GI Bill cuts builds: 'Either you’re with us or against us'

4/14/2016

0 Comments

 
Fight over GI Bill cuts builds: 'Either you’re with us or against us'
​
​By: Leo Shane III    
The Military Times
This article was originally published at 8:56 p.m. EDT April 14, 2016.
A coalition of Democratic lawmakers and veterans organizations is vowing to block any legislation that includes proposed cuts to the Post-9/11 GI Bill, even if that means shelving a host of other proposals they authored.
At issue is a measure passed without objection in the House earlier this year which would cut in half the housing stipend for dependents of veterans attending school on GI Bill benefits. The move would save the government about $773 million over the next 10 years and help pay for a host of other veterans initiatives.
"This goes back on a promise that all of us here are unwilling to break," said Rep. Tim Walz, D-Minn. "In the entire federal budget, there is nowhere else to fund [veterans] programs? That cannot stand."
For students in high-cost cities such as San Diego or New York, that cut would total $1,000 to $1,800 a month. It would not affect students already using the transferred benefit but could affect families planning on the extra money in the future.
But officials from Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America said the move goes back on a promise made to those families that the full benefit would be available when they need it, and for the first time pulls money out of the GI Bill to fund outside programs.
They painted the legislative proposal as a betrayal of veterans' service and accused lawmakers of viewing earned benefits as a "piggy bank" for other wants.
"This is a whole new level of stupid, to cut the GI Bill in a time of war," said Paul Rieckhoff, CEO of IAVA. "This is about keeping a promise, investing in the future, about retention and recruiting and morale.
"Find the money somewhere else. Either you're with us or against us."
Officials from Student Veterans of America pushed back on that ultimatum, saying the issue is more complex than the opposition coalition will admit.
"We need to remember who the Post-9/11 GI Bill was intended for: veterans," said Derek Fronabarger, SVA's director of policy.
He challenged the idea that the legislative proposal amounts to "cuts" in veterans benefits, saying "in reality the changes are a transfer of benefits from dependents, via a 50 percent drop in [housing stipends], to Fry Scholarship recipients and reservists."
Supporters of the cut have also argued that the benefit is overly generous to children of troops, sometimes awarding them housing stipends well beyond their dorm and living costs.
Savings from the change also would go to pay for a host of other programs, leaving other veterans groups with a difficult choice of whether to support the proposal.
"The Veterans of Foreign Wars would never actively support any standalone provision that reduces benefits for veterans or service members, but we felt that [this bill], taken in its entirety, contained enough good provisions to support its passage," said VFW national spokesman Joe Davis.
He noted that among those are improvements to postnatal care for female veterans, expanded service animal therapy for veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder, reauthorization of the veterans work-study programs, and critical changes to VA home loan guarantees.
But Walz and others argued that's a false choice. Michael Little, director of legislative affairs for the Association of the United States Navy, said any cut to the GI Bill benefit risks adding to the stress load of military and veteran families.
"If we want to talk about funding veterans' benefits, the last place we need to look for money is in the GI Bill," he said. "The discussion about the GI Bill shouldn't be about where we'll cut, it should be on sustaining and strengthening it beyond our current military budget situation."
So far, Senate lawmakers haven't indicated whether they'll move ahead with the House proposal or revise it for inclusion in an anticipated veterans omnibus package due out before the end of the month.
Opponents hope the latest objections convince them to look elsewhere for money.
"When we look troops in the eye and make them promises … they expect us to keep those promises," said Rep. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill. "It's not fair to rob one group of veterans to pay for services for another.
"We can do better."
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Author

    Michael is a 35 year old member of the Navy Individual Ready Reserves (IRR), with 16 years of Naval Service and 8 years of Government Relations experience.  
    ​
    He is a:
    Father
    Husband
    Son
    Brother
    Combat Disabled Navy Veteran
    USCG Spouse
    USCG Auxiliarist
    Military & Veteran Advocate
    Military & Veteran Spouse Advocate
    Business Owner
    Philanthropist​
    Catholic
    Zionist

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    RSS Feed

    DISCLAIMER:  "The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of his employer, or any entity of the U.S. Government"

    Categories

    All
    ABMA
    Coast Guard
    Family
    Home
    Israel
    McLeansboro
    Navy
    Politics
    Pro Israel
    Shutdown
    Veterans
    VFW

    Archives

    October 2022
    December 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    January 2017
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    October 2015
    July 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    November 2013
    September 2013

"There are no great men, only great challenges that ordinary men are forced by circumstances to meet."   
Fleet Admiral William Frederick Halsey Jr.
Chat Directly With Mike ×

Connecting

You: ::content::
::agent_name:: ::content::
::content::
::content::